It is a framework, meaning it gathers more assumptions, forming an ontology through which an explanation for various conjectures within the framework are being developed and justified, in a scientific way. It may be a falsifiable theory (eg. in the front of others looking for deeper meaning like quantum, or forces far outside Gaia, or stictly mathematically provable (scale-free)), but in itself, as in any "externsion" it of course tries to maintain an assumed core and a belt and expect to further test or disprove the statements through observation or experiment.
On the other hand, within the Zeitgeist for the medium of science is to be embraced in a form of relaxed "causal nexus," and a more holistic and integrative view is to be maybe taken into consideration. A scientific demarcation seen through the many lens out there, to many realities we make, acknowledge the boundaries in sciences, that would in turn enact new meaning, and not for fixing things forever, see along the history, the confounding of "isms", and even taking the "language as the only knowable reality" (L. Wittgenstein) as a boundary.
Thus regarding the scientific demarcation in relation to an epistemological flexibility in the sense of broadening the view, as the framework itself employs:
1. It encourages integration with various philosophical traditions and practices.
2. It promotes a holistic view of knowledge and existence; values personal and cultural differences.
3. Emphasizes Empathy and relational ethics through study of the Symbols, and then chooses an appropriate engagement among parties.
4. Acknowledge the Symbols are interconnected and influence understanding and meaning in a powerful way and that they represent the meaning of drive of cultures and of the many kinds of minds out there (including the other forms of life.)
5. The nature of truth, in a scientific sense, is dynamic and relational and it emerges always through "oracles" and the interactions between Symbols. At the same time nothing is in isolation.
6. And as instances we should see the power of making all functional around us, and try see the problems also from the perspective of if "should we?"
7. The practice of transparency in scientific endeavor, by seeing through Symbols: see the planting of the seeds along and tracing of a "Denkbewegung" as being the main and the true rich parts one can further explore and not by building in the final "truths" of a writing.
8. The only time we can prove we have a trace of intelligent behavior, is to see the whole and see how we can take the helm. As we are modeling ourselves and we model our space, so modeling of solutions is through integrative, interdisciplinary, horizontal and unitary approach towards the general processes and thus Gaia as itself operating in similar ways too.
9. Thus the validity of a scientific theory would be upgraded and based on coherence, resonance, and the practical applicability at the Gaia scale.
10. Remembering us that what we do most of the time, especially in long endeavors, is ultimately a form of practicing art and expression.
the flexibility in the scientific demarcation can be then shifted in terms of Symbolosophy. Towards a more integrative wisdom, art, science, acknowledging a soft volition medium that comes from many directions, as well as the dynamic nature of reaching "truths", all under a holistic coherence mean in a resonance within the ecological.
The development as a framework although came a long way, was put "on paper" during 2023-2024 (legacy here). It will continue development in a more formalizing way of the concepts beginning with the thesis.
